Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Introduction

The 2025 WASSCE results sparked nationwide anxiety. Moments after WAEC released the grades, social media erupted with videos of devastated candidates crying after discovering multiple failures. Parents, teachers, and former students described the performance as “shocking,” with many insisting that the Mathematics paper in particular had been unusually difficult. The speculation grew louder because the decline was steep: a single year had undone nearly half a decade of consistent improvement in the core subjects.

This explainer examines the available evidence, including long-term WAEC pass-rate data, examiners’ reports, interviews with WAEC and the Ghana Education Service (GES), and a comparison of the 2025 questions with past papers. The goal is to clarify whether the exams themselves were unusually complex or whether the results reflect long-standing weaknesses in the school system.

The long trend of poor Mathematics and Science performances

WAEC and GES data confirm that Ghana’s struggles in Mathematics and Integrated Science did not begin in 2025. Pass rates in these subjects have been persistently low across several years.

In 2014, for example, only 32 per cent of candidates earned A1–C6 in Mathematics, and fewer than 30 per cent passed Integrated Science. The pattern repeated in 2015, when barely a quarter of candidates passed Maths, and just over 23 per cent passed Science.

Performance began to improve gradually after 2018, with noticeable gains by 2019 and dramatic jumps in 2024. In that year, roughly two-thirds of candidates passed both Maths and Social Studies, and English Language recorded one of its strongest performances in a decade. This rise created the expectation that Ghana had finally overcome the worst of its recurring WASSCE weaknesses — which is why the 2025 decline felt so sudden and so personal to many students.

The data, however, shows a longer story. In 2025, the proportion of candidates passing Core Mathematics fell from 66.86 per cent in 2024 to 48.73 per cent. 

Social Studies dropped from 71.53 to 55.82 per cent. English and Integrated Science remained relatively stable, but the two significant declines were dramatic enough to shape the public conversation. WAEC’s failure statistics underline the severity of the shift.

In 2025, more than half of all candidates failed Core Mathematics, representing over 220,000 students. A similar pattern occurred in Social Studies, where nearly 200,000 students failed the paper. These were not small margins; they were reversals large enough to trigger national concern.

One of the defining features of the 2025 results was the emotional reaction from candidates.

However, public emotion alone cannot confirm whether the exam was truly more difficult than in previous years. WAEC’s own explanation contradicts this popular belief.

Social Studies (2020–2025)

Similarly, Social Studies exams have consistently tested Ghanaian social/civic knowledge. Past questions frequently revolved around societal norms, civics, and everyday issues. 

For instance, a 2020 question asked: “Which of the following options must not be pursued as a purpose of marriage in Ghanaian society?” 

Answer: having sexual relations with anyone. The 2025 Social Studies paper also focused on democracy, rights, local governance, economics, and cultural themes – broadly the same categories as in prior years. (Commentators note 2025 emphasised, for example, democracy and economic topics, similar in scope to previous exams.) Again, nothing suggests the 2025 Social Studies questions were outside the familiar syllabus; rather, the unusually high failure rate likely reflects stricter invigilation and candidate performance.

WAEC’s explanation: No change in exam difficulty

WAEC’s Public Relations Officer, John Kapi, told DUBAWA that the Council conducted an internal audit of the entire exam process and found no irregularities or changes that could explain an abnormal shift in performance. 

He described the 2025 results as a “true reflection” of the candidates’ competencies and dismissed claims that the Mathematics paper was intentionally made more complex.

According to WAEC, preliminary summaries from the chief examiners show that many candidates lacked proficiency in application-based questions.

In Mathematics, several students struggled to represent data on diagrams, to construct and interpret cumulative frequency tables, and to solve everyday word problems, skills that have been examined for years. 

In Social Studies, many were unable to link textbook knowledge to everyday national issues, such as the impact of expensive funerals on development or the relevance of Ghana’s cooperation with the United Nations. These weaknesses were not new, but their severity increased in 2025.

WAEC emphasised that the test blueprint, which includes recall, application, and synthesis, remained unchanged. The exam did not shift to only “application” questions, as some viral posts suggested. Instead, the Council argues, students simply struggled to perform at the expected level.

GES’s position: Stricter exam integrity and a true reflection of learning 

The Ghana Education Service supported WAEC’s explanation. GES Public Relations officer, Daniel Fenyi, told DUBAWA that the results accurately reflect “what our learners can do.” He described the outcomes as worrying but insisted that they were not the result of unfair examinations.

Fenyi explained that GES enforced the strictest exam integrity in recent years during the 2025 WASSCE. More than 6,600 subject results were cancelled, which is the highest number in four years, due to attempted malpractices involving mobile phones and foreign materials. He argued that the crackdown on cheating meant candidates had to rely entirely on their own knowledge, exposing previously masked deficiencies.

He further stressed that claims about an unusually difficult Maths paper were misleading. Topics such as logarithms, mensuration, circle theorems, and real-life application problems have appeared in past WASSCE papers for decades. The 2025 exam, he noted, was simply another iteration of well-established question patterns.

Comparing past questions: Was 2025 really different?

To evaluate whether the 2025 exam diverged significantly from earlier years, DUBAWA examined sample questions from 2019, 2020, 2021, 2023, and 2024 in Core Mathematics and Social Studies.

The comparison shows a consistent pattern. For example, in 2024, Maths candidates were given questions requiring them to multiply numbers in standard form and determine the number of terms in an arithmetic sequence — very similar in structure and difficulty to the 2025 tasks on logarithms, mensuration, and cumulative frequency. Likewise, Social Studies questions from earlier years asked candidates to analyse everyday social issues and explain the consequences of civic behaviour, themes identical to those examined in 2025.

The available evidence suggests no dramatic change in content or complexity. What changed was the students’ performance, not the structure of the questions.

A data-driven explanation helps to separate fact from speculation, especially at a time when social media narratives can overshadow verified information. 

By analysing WAEC and GES data, examiner reports, past exam papers, and public reaction, this explainer provides a balanced and factual account of why the results turned out the way they did.

Conclusion

The steep decline in the 2025 WASSCE pass rates, particularly in Mathematics and Social Studies, has caused widespread anxiety across the country. However, the available evidence does not support claims that WAEC introduced unusually difficult papers. Instead, the data points to longstanding weaknesses in foundational learning, which are exacerbated by stronger examination integrity measures and many candidates’ inability to apply what they have learned.

The emotional reaction from students reflects how much these results matter to families and communities, but emotion alone cannot explain the collapse in performance. A combination of systemic issues: uneven teaching quality, reliance on shortcuts, and gaps in basic competencies, is at the heart of the 2025 outcome. Understanding this reality is the first step toward improving future performance and restoring confidence in Ghana’s education system.